The topic for discussion today on one of my listservs for writers and editors involved the New York Times decision to begin charging for online subscriptions and whether any of us would pony up to have it delivered to our inbox.  Here's my response:
Today's topic is one that I'm impassioned about, so please forgive my  soapbox speech here.
As a high school journalism teacher back in the early '60s in Long  Beach, CA, I subscribed to two dailies, the Los Angeles Times in the  a.m. and the Long Beach Independent Press-Telegram in the evening. I  toted the Times to school each day to use with my beginning journalism  classes. In the evening I would come home from work, curl up with a  glass of wine and read the local news.
Now I live in NE Washington, about 70 miles north of Spokane. Our  Spokane daily has shrunk, but I still support it. And I subscribe to  both the Chewelah and Colville weeklies to keep up with local news,  since I live between the two communities. I also get the Los Angeles  Times, Christian Science Monitor, Seattle Newsline on line, and have the  New York Times and Reuters news on My Yahoo page.
Having lived and worked all over the world with Peace Corps,  international news is very important to me. It informs my voting  decisions, and the causes and charities I want to support. I also  alternate between subscriptions to Time and Newsweek  magazines.
During the decade that I lived overseas in four developing countries,  when folks asked about what I missed, I'd list big city Sunday papers,  the Lakers on television, frozen yogurt and bubble baths. When I worked  at Peace Corps HQ in Washington DC, I could hardly wait to open my  three-pound Washington Post each Sunday.
But I know that younger people do not access much objective journalism  or favor print. They tend to get their news and commentary from websites  such as The Huffington Post, Salon, and hardly impartial television  stations such as Fox News and MSNBC. I'm wondering if they are able  anymore to distinguish between objective reporting and opinion.
Dinosaur that I may be, at least I am semi-retired. My son, who followed  in my journalistic footsteps, has spent over thirty years with four Los  Angeles area papers. He was with the Press Telegram, the Valley Daily  News, the Orange County Register, and for the past six years has been  chief copy editor for the Times Sunday Calendar entertainment section.
During the past year and a half he has survived four rounds of layoffs  there, but is grateful that the Times has not yet reduced anybody's  salary or forced them to take unpaid furloughs. His former college  colleagues with papers in Detroit, western Washington and smaller  California cities, have lost jobs or have had their working hours and  compensation drastically reduced. He is about thirteen years shy of  retirement age, and really has no other kind of work experience.
I still treasure my moments with the daily paper. I like the rattle of  the pages, perusing the sports statistics, pouring over the letters to  the editors, and when I have a moment, especially during television  commercial breaks, working the crossword puzzles.
I'm hoping that the fourth estate outlives me, but sometimes I'm afraid  it won't.
"The basis of our governments being the opinion of the people, the  very first object should be to keep that right; and were it left to me  to decide whether we should have a government without newspapers or  newspapers without a government, I should not hesitate a moment to  prefer the latter. But I should mean that every man should receive those  papers and be capable of reading them." --Thomas Jefferson to Edward  Carrington, 1787.
I'd only add, and every 
woman, too.
On a lighter note, today was a glorious start of March in these  parts...56 degrees, more like late April! 
Warm regards, Terri Elders